Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants

 

To prove driving under the influence, the state must prove these elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

Any combination of these substances: The defendant can be under the influence of a controlled substance, an inhalant, intoxicating liquor, or any combination of these substances.  To secure a conviction for driving while under the influence of intoxicants, the state must provide evidence that supports all three of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt. If any of these elements cannot be proven, the defendant may not be found guilty of the offense.  Possession of Controlled Substance(s)To prove unlawful possession of a controlled substance, the state must demonstrate the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

To secure a conviction for this crime, it must be proven that the defendant knowingly or intentionally had possession of a controlled substance.  A controlled substance is defined as a drug or its immediate precursor categorized in Schedules I–V under the Federal Controlled Substances Act. However, it is important to note that the definition explicitly excludes certain substances:

Additionally, psilocybin and psilocin are not considered controlled substances under this definition, but only if a person manufactures, delivers, or possesses them in accordance with the provisions of ORS 475A.210 to 475A.722 and the rules adopted under those statutes.To secure a conviction for possession of a controlled substance, the state must provide evidence that supports all three of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt. If any of these elements cannot be proven, the defendant may not be found guilty of the offense.

If you have been accused of a crime, please call us.


1-866-650-4242